 PUBLICATIONS
 DATA CENTER
 WATER DATA & STUDIES
 INFORMATION CENTER
 ABOUT KANSAS WSC
 USGS IN YOUR STATE
USGS Water Science Centers are located in each state.
|
U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018B
Download this chapter as a PDF file
(183 KB)
Download a free copy of
Acrobat Reader
Occurrence of Cotton Herbicides and Insecticides in Playa Lakes of the High Plains of
West Texas
By E.M. Thurman, K.C. Bastian, and Tony Mollhagan
CONTENTS
FIGURES
Figure 1. Map showing location of study area where playa lakes were sampled
in West Texas, July 22-23, 1997
Figure 2. Graph showing frequency of
detections of herbicides and metabolites in 32 playa-lake samples from High Plains of
West Texas
Figure 3. Graph showing concentrations of parent
herbicides and metabolites in playa-lake samples from High Plains of West Texas
Figure 4. Graph showing mean concentrations of
herbicides and metabolites in 32 playa-lake samples from High Plains of West Texas
Figure 5. Graph showing comparison of atrazine and atrazine metabolite
concentrations in playa-lake samples
Figure 6. Graph showing comparison of cotton herbicide and metabolite
concentrations in playa-lake samples
During the summer of 1997, water samples were collected and analyzed for pesticides from 32
playa lakes of the High Plains that receive drainage from both cotton and corn agriculture in
West Texas. The major cotton herbicides detected in the water samples were diuron,
fluometuron, metolachlor, norflurazon, and prometryn. Atrazine and propazine, corn and sorghum
herbicides, also were routinely detected in samples from the playa lakes. Furthermore, the
metabolites of all the herbicides studied were found in the playa-lake samples. In some cases,
the concentration of metabolites was equal to or exceeded the concentration of the parent
compound. The types of metabolites detected suggested that the parent compounds had been
transported to and had undergone degradation in the playa lakes. The types of metabolites and
the ratio of metabolites to parent compounds may be useful in indicating the time that the
herbicides were transported to the playa lakes. The median concentration of total herbicides
was 7.2 micrograms per liter, with the largest total concentrations exceeding 30 micrograms
per liter. Organophosphate insecticides were detected in only one water sample. Further work
will improve the understanding of the fate of these compounds in the playa lakes area.
Cotton farming may require as much as 7 kg/ha (kilograms per hectare) of herbicides and 5
kg/ha of insecticides annually (Coupe and others, 1998). The intensive application of
pesticides often is necessary, especially in the Southern United States, where weed and insect
pressures are great. Applications of pesticides to cotton are three to five times greater per
hectare than applications to corn and occur more frequently (average of 4.7 annual
applications compared to 1.2) (Coupe and others, 1998), yet there have been few regional
studies of water quality and pesticide fate in cotton-producing areas of the country. For this
reason, the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Toxics Substances Hydrology Program initiated
research on the occurrence of cotton pesticides in the aquatic environment with the purpose of
determining the extent and magnitude of herbicide and insecticide concentrations in both
surface and ground water of the Southern United States.
Since the inception of this water-quality research in 1995, two publications have described
the extent of occurrence of cotton pesticides in surface water (Coupe and others, 1998;
Thurman and others, 1998). The first publication (Thurman and others, 1998) dealt with the
occurrence of cotton pesticides in surface water of the Mississippi Embayment. The work
described in this fact sheet indicates that cotton herbicides occur frequently in surface
water, with the major compounds, in order of percent detections, being: fluometuron >
cyanazine > metolachlor > norflurazon > prometryn. Unfortunately, the phenylurea herbicide,
diuron, was not examined in this earlier work. Insecticides were also reported in this study,
with the important detections being: dicrotophos > profenofos > methyl parathion > malathion.
A second publication by Coupe and others (1998) dealt with the usage of herbicides and their
occurrence in surface water of the Mississippi Delta. A major finding described in the report
was that the distribution and duration of total herbicide concentrations were much different
from that found in regional studies of herbicides in the Midwestern United States (Coupe and
others, 1998). In the Midwest, the total herbicide concentration in surface water showed a
sharp peak during the spring immediately after application of herbicides to crops, followed by
a gradual decrease in concentration (Thurman and others, 1991; Thurman and others, 1992). In
the Mississippi Delta, the total herbicide concentration in surface water was more sustained,
with multiple peaks due to different application times and post-emergent applications of
herbicides on cotton and rice (Coupe and others, 1998).
In this paper, the concentrations of herbicides and insecticides in water samples from playa
lakes of the West Texas High Plains are reported because playa lakes form the major surface
drainage in the area. Playa lakes are small lakes formed from precipitation and runoff in arid
regions and are temporary lakes that either evaporate or infiltrate into the soil.
Land-surface drainage is to playa lakes after rainfall. Farmers in the High Plains of West
Texas grow both dryland (nonirrigated) cotton and irrigated cotton. Water samples were
collected from each of 32 playa lakes (fig. 1) on July 22-23, 1997, after
pesticide application to cotton in the region.
Surface-water grab samples were collected at each of the 32 playa lakes. Samples were filtered
through 0.70-µm (micrometer) glass-fiber filters and stored on ice until analyzed at the
USGS laboratory in Lawrence, KS. Water samples were analyzed for the following parent
compounds: atrazine, cyanazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor, norflurazon, prometryn, and
propazine.
Materials used in analysis consisted of C-18 cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA) with 350 mg
(milligrams) of 40-µm, C-18 bonded silica. Analytical standards were obtained from
various sources. Atrazine, cyanazine, 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA), deethylatrazine (DEA),
deisopropyl-atrazine (DIA), deisopropylprometryn, dicrotophos, diuron, fluometuron,
hydroxyatrazine, metolachlor, norflurazon, prometryn, and propazine were obtained from Supleco
(West Chester, PA). Dichloromethylphenylurea (DCMPU) and dichlorophenylurea (DCPU) were
obtained from Jennifer Field, Oregon State University (Corvallis, Oregon). Demethylfluometuron
(DMFM), trifluoromethylphenylurea (TFMPU), and trifluoromethylaniline (TFMA) were obtained
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service (Stoneville, MS).
Demethylnorflurazon was obtained from Sandoz Agro, Inc. (Des Plaines, IL). Metolachlor
oxanilic acid was obtained from Novartis (Greensboro, NC). Metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid
was synthesized in the USGS laboratory in Lawrence, KS, by Aga and others (1996).
The following gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method is also described in Thurman
and others (1990). Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was automated on a Waters Millilab workstation
(Milford, MA). C-18 Sep-Pak cartridges were conditioned sequentially with 2 mL (milliliters)
methanol, 2 mL ethyl acetate, 2 mL methanol, and 3 mL distilled water. Each 123-mL water
sample was spiked with a surrogate standard, terbuthyl- azine (1.23 ng/µL, nanograms per
microliter; 100 µL, microliters), and pumped through the cartridge at a rate of 20
mL/min (milliliters per minute) by a robotic probe. Analytes were eluted with ethyl acetate
and spiked automatically with phenanthrene d-10 (0.2 ng/µL, 500 µL). The extract
was evaporated by a TurboVap (Zymark, Palo Alto, CA) at 45 °C (degrees Celsius) under
nitrogen gas to 100 µL.
GC/MS analysis of the eluates was carried out using a Hewlett-Packard model 5890A GC
interfaced to a 5970A mass selective detector (MSD) (Palo Alto, CA). One microliter
(1 µL) of sample was injected automatically. Separation of the herbicides and
insecticides was accomplished with a fused-silica capillary column of 5-percent phenyl methyl
silicone (Ultra 2) with a film thickness of 0.33 µm, 12 m (meter) x 0.2 mm (millimeter)
inside diameter (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow
rate of 1 mL/min and a head pressure of 35 kPa (kilopascals). The column temperature was held
at 60 °C for 1 minute ramped at 6 °C per minute to 200 °C, and then ramped at 30
°C per minute to 250 °C, where the temperature was held for 4 minutes. The samples
were injected in the splitless mode using an autoinjector at an injector temperature of 180
°C.
The source of the mass spectrometer was held at 280 °C. The emission current was 70 eV
(electronvolts). The electron multiplier was set at 400 V (volts) above autotune. The
filament and multiplier were turned on after 4 minutes into the analysis. An autotune using
perfluorotributylamine was performed daily prior to analysis of samples. The calibration curve
was prepared on the basis of the area ratio of the base peaks relative to the response of the
188 (amu) ion of phenanthrene d-10, the internal standard. Confirmation of the compounds was
based on the presence of the molecular ion and two confirming ions, a retention-time match
within 0.2 percent relative to phenanthrene d-10, and correct area ratios of the confirming
ions.
Metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and metolachlor oxanilic acid were analyzed according
to the method of Hostetler and Thurman (1999). Briefly, high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) is carried out on two in-line analytical columns. First is an octadecyl silica (ODS)
5-&muccro; (micron), 250- x 3-mm column coupled to an ODS 3-µ, 250- x 4.6-mm column. The
mobile phase was 60:35:5 of pH 7.0, 25-mM (millimole) phosphate buffer/methanol/acetonitrile
with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The instrument consisted of a high-performance liquid
chromatograph, Hewlett-Packard 1090 (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA), equipped with a diode
array detector.
Using the previously described automated SPE procedure, diuron and its metabolites, DCMPU and
DCPU, were extracted from water. The ethyl acetate extract was solvent exchanged to methanol
by evaporating to approximately 100 µg/L, adding 2 mL methanol, and then evaporated to
40 µL. The final volume of the extract was adjusted to 75 µL by the addition of
35 µL of pH 7.0 phosphate buffer.
The extract then was analyzed by HPLC. The analytical columns used were identical to the
previously described columns. The mobile phase consisted of 50 percent methanol and 50
percent, pH 7.0 phosphate buffer, with a gradient ramping to 75 percent methanol. The flow
rate was 0.5 mL/min.
The detection and quantitation limits were 0.05 µg/L for all compounds analyzed by GC/MS
and 0.2 µg/L for compounds analyzed by HPLC. All laboratory blanks were free of
pesticides or metabolites. The variation of the duplicate samples was within ±5 percent
at one standard deviation. The correlation coefficients of the standard curves were 0.998
±0.002. Any samples with concentrations greater than 10 µg/L were diluted and
re-analyzed.
Cotton and (or) corn herbicides were detected in 97 percent of one-time samples from 32 playa
lakes in the High Plains of West Texas. The playa-lake samples contained nine herbicides and
their metabolites. The herbicides were, in order of percent detections: diuron > prometryn >
atrazine > propazine > metolachlor > fluometuron > norflurazon > simazine > cyanazine
(fig. 2). Only atrazine and propazine are not used on
cotton; however, corn and sorghum are also grown adjacent to the cotton and are the most
probable sources of atrazine and propazine in the playa lakes. All of the playa-lake samples
contained herbicides, with a median concentration of total herbicide of (parent herbicides and
metabolites) of 7.2 µg/L and a range from 0.57 to 33 µg/L.
Figure 3 shows the total concentration of all herbicides and
metabolites detected in samples from each playa lake. Metabolites make up a significant
proportion of the total herbicide concentration in the lake samples
(fig. 3). Only one playa-lake sample (playa lake 19) did not
contain metabolites. The median metabolite percentage was 27 percent of the total herbicide
present. The highest metabolite percentage was 70.5 percent. The metabolites that were
detected (fig. 2) included three metabolites of
atrazine (deisopropylatrazine or DIA, deethylatrazine or DEA, and hydroxyatrazine), three
metabolites of diuron (dichloromethylphenylurea or DCMPU, dichlorophenylurea or DCPU, and
3,4-dichloroaniline or 3, 4-DCA), two metabolites of fluometuron (demethylfluometuron and
trifluoromethylaniline or TFMA), two metabolites of metolachlor (metolachlor ethane sulfonic
acid or metolachlor ESA and metolachlor oxanilic acid), one metabolite of norflurazon
(demethylnorflurazon), and one metabolite of prometryn (deisopropylprometryn). Of these
metabolites, the most frequently detected (fig. 2) were DEA
(atrazine), at more than 60 percent detections, followed by DCMPU (diuron) >
deisopropylprometryn (prometryn) > 3,4-DCA (diuron) > hydroxyatrazine (atrazine) > DCPU
(diuron) > DIA (atrazine) > metolachlor oxanilic acid (metolachlor) > metolachlor ESA
(metolachlor) > demethylnorflorazon (norflurazon) > TFMA > demethylfluometuron (fluometuron).
Figure 4 shows mean concentrations of herbicides and metabolites
detected in the playa-lake samples. Compounds with relatively high mean concentrations are
diuron (2.7 µg/L), prometryn (1.3 µg/L), and metolachlor (1.0 µg/L).
Nondetections were averaged as 0.0 in mean calculations. The frequency of detection
(fig. 2) and the mean concentrations
(fig. 4) of these three compounds indicate that they are
probably the ones most used and readily transported into the playa lakes. All three compounds
are used on cotton, and metolachlor also may be used on corn and sorghum. The other cotton
herbicide that was detected frequently was fluometuron, which had a mean concentration of 0.5
µg/L. Maps of fluometuron use in 1992 show that it was not used in West Texas (Thurman
and others, 1998). However, these maps may be incorrect on the basis of detections of
fluometuron in the playa-lake samples. That information is not consistent with the results of
the 1997 sampling.
Metabolites of four cotton herbicides (diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor, and prometryn) also
were detected in samples from many of these same playa lakes. For example, the metabolites of
diuron (DCMPU, DCPU, and 3,4-DCA) were found in 71 percent of the samples with positive
detections of diuron. DCMPU was the most frequently detected and was present at the highest
concentrations of the three metabolites. The mean concentrations of the three metabolites were
0.45 µg/L for DCMPU, 0.31 µg/L for 3,4-DCA, and 0.2 µg/L for DCPU
(fig. 4). Demethylation of the phenylurea herbicides is
apparently a common degradation pathway (Mueller and Moorman, 1991), and this pathway also
occurs in fluometuron. For example, the detected metabolites of fluometuron were
demethylfluometuron and TFMA; one is a demethylated metabolite (DMFM), and the other is
trifluomethylaniline and is analogous to the 3,4-DCA metabolite of diuron. Norflurazon also
degrades to a demethylated metabolite, demethylnorflurazon. That metabolite was detected in 16
percent of the samples with a mean concentration of 0.17 µg/L. Its concentration and
frequency of detection are similar to the parent compound, reflecting the fact that the
half-life of norflurazon is relatively short, approximately 45 days in soil (Ahrens, 1994).
Metolachlor metabolites included both the ESA and the oxanilic acid of metolachlor. The mean
concentration of the oxanilic acid metabolite was 0.19 µg/L as compared to 0.1
µg/L for the ESA metabolite. The fact that oxanilic acid concentration exceeded ESA
concentration (true for all samples) suggests that the degradation of the parent metolachlor
occurred in the playa lakes rather than in the soil. When metolachlor degrades chiefly in the
soil, the major metabolite is the ESA (Field and Thurman, 1996; Thurman and others, 1996;
Kalkhoff and others, 1998). Further work is underway to validate this hypothesis.
Another important cotton herbicide frequently detected in the playa-lake samples was
prometryn, with a frequency of detections of 72 percent and a mean concentration of 1.3
µg/L. The metabolite of prometryn, deisopropylprometryn, was in nearly every sample that
contained prometryn. The metabolite comes from the de-alkylation of the herbicide on the amino
side of the molecule, which is a common degradation pathway for triazine herbicides such as
prometryn. The relative abundance of the metabolite to the parent compound was 0.1 or about 10
percent of the mass of the parent compound. Prometryn is a resistant triazine with a long
half-life of about 60 days or more in the soil (Ahrens, 1994).
The other two triazine herbicides that were detected routinely in the playa-lake samples were
atrazine and propazine. Atrazine was detected in 72 percent of the samples with a mean
concentration of 0.47 µg/L. Propazine was detected in 59 percent of the samples with a
mean concentration of 0.25 µg/L. Atrazine and propazine have one common metabolite, DEA,
which was found in 63 percent of the samples with a mean concentration of 0.36 µg/L.
Because propazine has a longer soil half-life than atrazine (atrazine is 45-60 days and
propazine is at least 60 days), it is thought that atrazine is responsible for the majority of
the DEA. Furthermore, atrazine was present at a mean concentration that was about twice as
much as propazine. Commonly, propazine is detected at much lower concentrations than atrazine
because propazine is no longer used (voluntarily removed from the market in early 1990's by
the manufacturer); however, supplies remain, and it is apparent from these data that propazine
is still being used in the High Plains of West Texas.
An unusual finding was the presence of hydroxyatrazine in many of the playa-lake samples. It
was detected in 44 percent of the samples with a mean concentration of 0.56 µg/L, a
value comparable to that of atrazine. This result is unusual compared to the studies that have
been carried out in the Corn Belt of the Midwestern United States (Thurman and others, 1991;
1992). Lerch and others (1998) have shown that hydroxyatrazine is a minor component during the
growing season compared to the parent compound, atrazine. The more conservative nature of the
hydroxyatrazine has been ascribed to the insolubility and sorption of the hydroxyatrazine
metabolite to soil by a mixed-mode mechanism (Lerch and others, 1997). One explanation for the
higher concentrations of hydroxyatrazine in the playa-lake samples is the more alkaline soils
in this part of West Texas, where soil pH is commonly greater than 7. At these high pH values,
the mixed-mode mechanism is inactive because the negative log of the acid dissociation
constant (pKa) of hydroxyatrazine is approximately 5. Thus, at a pH that is 2 units
higher than the pKa, the molecule will not be positively charged, which would
lessen the effectiveness of the mixed-mode mechanism. For example, the hydroxyatrazine
concentration in the water sample from playa lake 30 was 5.4 µg/L, which is one of the
highest concentrations for hydroxyatrazine that has been measured (Lerch and others, 1998).
The ratio of metabolites to parent compounds has been suggested as a means of dating the
relative age of surface water that contains herbicides. Thurman and Fallon (1996) used the
deethylatrazine-to-atrazine ratio to indicate the age of surface water that has received
atrazine runoff. Figure 5 shows a comparison of atrazine concentrations to the total
concentrations of its metabolites as an indicator of this year's or previous years'
application of atrazine. The data show that metabolite concentrations are greater than or
equal to atrazine concentrations in many of the playa-lake samples. These data indicate that
the water in the lakes contains "old" (degraded) atrazine from previous years' application.
Figure 6 shows a comparison of cotton-herbicide concentrations to the total concentrations
of their metabolites in the playa-lake samples. The cotton-herbicide parent compounds exhibit
considerably higher concentrations than their metabolites, in spite of the fact that
half-lives for the cotton herbicides are comparable to the half-life for atrazine. Only the
sample from playa lake 9 contained about equal parent compound and metabolite concentrations
for the herbicides, with a concentration for both of about 6 µg/L. Data from this
sampling site suggest that the cotton herbicides may be from previous seasons.
Organophosphate insecticides were detected in only one sample from the 32 playa lakes for a
detection frequency of 3 percent. The one detection was dicrotophos. Other organophosphate
compounds that were analyzed were azinophos methyl, chlorpyrifos, malathion, methylparathion,
and profenfos. Organophosphate insecticide use on cotton in West Texas is extensive, with
more than 1.5 million kilograms (Gianessi and Anderson, 1995) applied annually for the State,
approximately half of which is used in the High Plains of West Texas. Thus, the amount used is
not an explanation for low detection frequency. However, the time of sampling was early summer
so that application may not have occurred prior to sampling. A check of application dates for
this area suggests that this could be a possible explanation. Another possible explanation is
that the half-life of organophosphate insecticides is generally short, less than 10 days.
Thus, degradation of the parent compounds also could be an explanation for the low detection
frequency. Another sampling of the playa lakes later in the season to provide more information
on concentrations in relation to timing of applications is planned for 1999.
Cotton and (or) corn herbicides were detected in 97 percent of one-time samples from 32 playa
lakes in the High Plains of West Texas. The major cotton herbicides detected were diuron,
fluometuron, metolachlor, norflurazon, and prometryn. The corn herbicide atrazine and its
metabolites also were commonly found in the playa-lake samples. Relative concentrations of
parent herbicides and their metabolites may be used as indicators of recent herbicide runoff
to the playa lakes as compared to previous years' applications. The presence of
hydroxyatrazine was notably high in concentration relative to many surface waters in the
Midwestern United States that have been studied. Organophosphate insecticides were detected in
only one sample from the playa lakes.
- Aga, D.S., Thurman, E.M., Yockel, M.E., and Williams, T.D., 1996, Identification of
a new metabolite of metolachlor in soil: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 30,
p. 592-597.
- Ahrens, W.H., 1994, Herbicide handbook (7th ed.): Champaign, Illinois, Weed Science
Society of America, p. 352.
- Bastian, K.C., Thurman, E.M., and Rebich, R.A., 1998, Comparison of enzyme-linked
immunoassay with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for analysis of the cotton
herbicide fluometuron, in Daniel, B.J., ed., Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight
Mississippi Water Resources Conference, April 7-8, 1998, Raymond, MS: Mississippi State,
Water Resources Research Institute, p. 45-55.
- Coupe, R.H., Thurman, E.M., and Zimmerman, L.R., 1998, Relation of usage to the
occurrence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta:
Environmental Science and Technology, v. 32, no. 23, p. 3673-3680.
- Field, J.A., and Thurman, E.M., 1996, The role of glutathione conjugation in the
detoxification of xenobiotic compounds in the environment: Environmental Science
Technology, v. 30, p. 1413-1417.
- Gianessi, L.P., and Anderson, J.E., 1995, Pesticide use in the U.S. crop
production--national data report: Washington, D.C., National Center for Food and
Agricultural Policy, unpaginated.
- Hostetler, K.A., and Thurman, E.M., 1999, Determination of ionic chloroacetanilide
herbicide metabolites in surface water and ground water by high-performance liquid
chromatography-diode array detection and high-performance liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry, in Morganwalp, D.W., and Buxton, H.T., eds., U.S. Geological Survey
Toxic Substances Hydrology Program--Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Charleston,
South Carolina, March 8-12, 1999--Volume 2--Contamination of Hydrologic Systems and
Related Ecosystems: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report
99-4018B, this volume.
- Kalkhoff, S.J., Kolpin, D.W., Thurman, E.M., Ferrer, Imma, and Barcelo, Damia,
1998, Degradation of chloroacetanilide herbicides--the prevalence of sulfonic and
oxanilic acid metabolites in Iowa ground and surface waters: Environmental Science and
Technology, v. 32, p. 1738-1740.
- Lerch, R.N., Blanchard, P.E., and Thurman, E.M., 1998, Contribution of hydrolyated
atrazine degradation products to the total atrazine load in Midwestern streams:
Environmental Science and Technology, v. 32, p. 40-48.
- Lerch, R.N., Thurman, E.M., and Kruger, E.L., 1997, Mixed-mode sorption of
hydroxylated atrazine degradation products in soil--a mechanism for bound residue:
Environmental Science and Technology, v. 31, p. 1539-1546.
- Mueller, T.C., and Moorman, T.A., 1991, Analysis of fluometuron and its metabolites
in soil: Journal of the Association of Analytical Chemists, v. 74, p. 671-673.
- Thurman, E.M., and Fallon, J.D., 1996, The deethylatrazine to atrazine ratio as an
indicator of the onset of the spring flush of herbicides into surface water of the
Midwestern United States: International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry,
v. 65, p. 203-214.
- Thurman, E.M., Goolsby, D.A., Aga, D.S., Pomes, M.L., and Meyer, M.T., 1996,
Occurrence of alachlor and its sulfonated metabolite into rivers and reservoirs of the
Midwestern United States--the importance of sulfonation in the transport of
chloroacetanilide herbicides: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 30, p. 569-574.
- Thurman, E.M., Goolsby, D.A., Meyer, M.T., and Kolpin, D.W., 1991, Herbicides in
surface waters of the midwestern United States-the effects of the spring flush:
Environmental Science and Technology, v. 25, p. 1794-1796.
- Thurman, E.M., Goolsby, D.A., Meyer, M.T., Mills, M.S., Pomes, M.L., and Kolpin,
D.W., 1992, A reconnaissance study of herbicides and their metabolites in surface water
using immunoassay and GC/MS: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 26, p. 2440-2447.
- Thurman, E.M., Meyer, Michael, Pomes, Michael, Perry, C.A., and Schwab, Paul, 1990,
Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry for the analysis of triazine herbicides in water: Analytical Chemistry, v.
62, p. 2043-2048.
- Thurman, E.M., Zimmerman, L.R., Scribner, E.A., and Coupe, R.H., Jr., 1998,
Occurrence of cotton pesticides in surface water of the Mississippi Embayment: U.S.
Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-022-98, 4 p.
E.M. Thurman, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS (ethurman@usgs.gov)
K.C. Bastian, Oread Laboratories, Lawrence, KS
Tony Mollhagan, Water Resources Division, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Additional information about the Organic Geochemistry Research Laboratory can be found at:
http://ks.water.usgs.gov/studies/reslab
For additional information contact:
Betty Scribner
U.S. Geological Survey
4821 Quail Crest Place
Lawrence, KS 66049-3839
Telephone: (785) 832-3564
Fax: (785) 832-3500
Email: scribner@usgs.gov
|