U.S. Geological Survey
Fact Sheet 096-01
Prepared in cooperation with the
CITY OF WICHITA
Download this report as a PDF file (585 KB)
Download a free copy of
Acrobat Reader
Effects of Artificial Recharge on Water Quality in the Equus Beds Aquifer,
South-Central Kansas, 1995-2000
A.C. Ziegler, H.C. Roos, T.J. Trombley, and V.G. Christensen
CONTENTS
This fact sheet describes the effects of artificial recharge on the Equus Beds aquifer for
concentrations of four chemicals of concern--chloride, arsenic, total coliform bacteria, and
atrazine. These four chemicals were determined to be of the greatest concern after determining
the effects of recharge by comparing the median concentrations of more than 400 chemicals in
more than 4,000 samples collected before and after artificial recharge activities began.
The water supply for the city of Wichita, south-central Kansas, currently comes from the
Wichita well field and Cheney Reservoir (fig.
1). Because these sources are not expected to meet projected city water needs into the
21st century (Warren and others, 1995), artificial recharge of the Equus Beds aquifer
is being investigated as one alternative to meet future water-supply demands. An additional
potential benefit of artificial recharge includes preventing degradation of the water quality
of the aquifer by chloride plumes from the Arkansas River to the southwest and the Burrton oil
field to the northwest (Ziegler and others, 1999).
In 1995, the Equus Beds Ground-Water Recharge Demonstration Project began evaluation of
artificial recharge techniques and their effects on water quality in the aquifer. The
demonstration project is a cooperative effort among the city of Wichita, Bureau of Reclamation
(U.S. Department of the Interior), and the U.S. Geologicial Survey (USGS).
Water from the Little Arkansas River is diverted for artificial recharge when flow in the
river exceeds base flow in accordance with the Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of
Water Resources, permit conditions (Burns and McDonnell, 1998). Water is artificially
recharged to the Equus Beds aquifer, which is part of the High Plains aquifer and
consists of alluvial (river-deposited) sediments of sand and gravel interbedded with clay and
silt.
At the Halstead diversion well site (fig.
1), water is diverted from the Little Arkansas River by pumping a diversion well completed
immediately adjacent to the river that induces the surface water into the well. This diverted
source water then is pumped to the Halstead recharge site and recharged to the aquifer by
basin, trench, or well. Recharge of the Equus Beds aquifer at the Halstead site began
in May 1997.
Recharge water for the Sedgwick recharge site is diverted directly from the Little Arkansas
River. It is treated to reduce turbidity (the cloudy appearance of water caused by suspended
matter) and to remove organic compounds, including the herbicide atrazine, using powder
activated carbon (PAC). The diverted water is recharged to the Equus Beds aquifer at
the Sedgwick site through recharge basins (Ziegler and others, 1999). Recharge of the
Equus Beds aquifer at the Sedgwick site began in April 1998.
From 1995-2000, the USGS monitored water-quality conditions during all aspects of the
artificial recharge process. More than 4,000 water samples from the Little Arkansas River,
diverted source water, and monitoring wells near the recharge areas were analyzed for more
than 400 inorganic and organic chemicals including those with U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) drinking-water standards. Water-quality monitoring prior to recharge indicated
that sodium, chloride, nitrite plus nitrate, iron, manganese, total coliform bacteria, and
atrazine were chemicals of concern relating to artificial recharge activities (Ziegler and
others, 1999). Chemicals of concern were defined as those with concentrations in
surface-water samples that exceeded 20 percent of the value of the drinking-water standard
established for these chemicals. Recharging water with large concentrations potentially could
degrade the water quality in the aquifer. Arsenic was added as a chemical of concern because
of a proposed revision of the USEPA MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) from 50 to 10 µg/L
(micrograms per liter).
Since 1999, there has been little change in sodium, nitrite plus nitrate, iron, and manganese
concentrations in water sampled for the Equus Beds Recharge Demonstration Project.
These chemicals exceeded drinking-water standards in some before-recharge samples of surface
water and ground water and are associated with saltwater (sodium), fertilizer application
(nitrite plus nitrate), or the natural aquifer material (iron and manganese). Water-quality
data presented in this report can be accessed on the Internet at
http://water.usgs.gov/ ks/nwis/qwdata
Through January 2001, 744 million gallons of water have been artificially recharged at the
Halstead site, and 136 million gallons have been artificially recharged at the Sedgwick site.
Current information about artificial recharge activities, including updated volumes of water
recharged to the aquifer, are available on the Internet at
http://ks.water.usgs.gov/studies/equus
Effects of Artificial Recharge on Water Quality
Chloride is a chemical of concern because of its large and variable concentrations in the
Little Arkansas River that can exceed drinking-water standards (Ziegler and others, 1999).
Degradation of the ground water caused by mixing with surface water containing large chloride
concentrations would be undesirable because one of the purposes of artificial recharge is to
raise water levels in the aquifer to prevent contamination from chloride plumes already
present in the ground water to the southwest and northwest of the Wichita well field (Ziegler
and others, 1999).
Chloride concentrations varied in samples from both surface-water monitoring sites in the
Little Arkansas River (fig. 2). Chloride concentrations
(median concentration 60 mg/L, milligrams per liter) in diverted source water at the Halstead
site were smaller and less variable than in samples of surface water because water from the
Little Arkansas River was induced into the aquifer at higher streamflows when chloride
concentrations were smaller. Dilution of the river water also occurs when it is mixed with
ground water in the aquifer resulting in lower chloride concentrations in the diverted source
water.
Since artificial recharge began at the Halstead site, median chloride concentrations in
samples from the shallow and deep monitoring wells were similar to median concentrations in
samples from diverted source water. Since recharge began, all chloride concentrations in
samples from the diverted source water and from both shallow and deep monitoring wells were
substantially less than the USEPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) for chloride of
250 mg/L in drinking water (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001). Concentrations
exceeding the SMCL will impart objectionable taste or increased corrosiveness to the water.
The median chloride concentration in samples from the treated diverted source water at the
Sedgwick site was 62 mg/L. Median chloride concentrations in water from the shallow
monitoring wells increased from about 10 to about 50 mg/L after artificial recharge began.
Median chloride concentrations in water from the deep monitoring wells at the Sedgwick
recharge site have not changed substantially from before to after recharge began.
Arsenic is a trace metal that is toxic to humans and is considered highly undesirable in
water supplies (Hem, 1992). The USEPA has recently (2001) proposed a revision to the arsenic
MCL from 50 to 10 µg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001). Arsenic
concentrations in water from the Little Arkansas River ranged from about 2 to 13 µg/L,
with a median concentration of about 5 µg/L (fig. 3).
Domestic wells near the Halstead recharge site also were sampled for arsenic in June 2000 to
determine concentrations in ground water adjacent to the recharge site. Arsenic
concentrations in water from five domestic wells (less than 100 feet deep) surrounding the
Halstead recharge site ranged from 2.2 to 12.5 µg/L, and the median concentration was
10 µg/L. Arsenic concentrations in the diverted source water at Halstead ranged from
about 16 to 24 µg/L.
Arsenic concentrations are naturally occurring at the Halstead site (Ziegler and others,
1999) and are derived from the aquifer material. Water from shallow monitoring wells at the
Halstead recharge site had relatively small concentrations of arsenic that never exceeded 5
µg/L. After recharge began at Halstead, arsenic concentrations in water from the deep
monitoring wells increased in one well to concentrations similar to the diverted source water
and remained near 10 µg/L in water from the other deep monitoring well.
The median arsenic concentration determined in water samples from both deep monitoring wells
at the Halstead site after artificial recharge began was 11 µg/L and exceeded the
proposed MCL by 1.0 µg/L but was considerably less than the median concentration of 20
µg/L for samples from the diverted source water. These data suggest that geochemical
reactions or dilution are occurring in the ground water at this site. At the Sedgwick site,
arsenic concentrations in all ground-water samples before and after recharge were
substantially less than the proposed MCL of 10 µg/L.
The presence of total coliform bacteria in water is not directly harmful to humans but, in
large numbers, may indicate the presence of other microorganisms that may adversely affect
health (Hem, 1992). Large bacterial densities have been detected in the Little Arkansas
River. Median bacterial densities in samples from both the Halstead and Sedgwick
surface-water monitoring sites were 800 and 1,200 col/100 mL (colonies per 100 milliliters of
water), respectively. Large bacterial densities in the Little Arkansas River can be
associated with large turbidity levels (large amounts of suspended materials) and streamflows
(Christensen and others, 2000) and may result from runoff from livestock operations and
wastewater discharge upstream. The MCL for total coliform bacteria is 0 col/100 mL in treated
drinking water (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001).
Maximum total coliform bacteria densities were substantially smaller in samples of diverted
source water at the Halstead site (less than 100 col/100 mL) and treated diverted water at
the Sedgwick site (400 col/100 mL) than in samples from the Little Arkansas River. The median
bacteria density in samples of diverted source water at the Halstead site was less than 1
col/100 mL, and for treated diverted water at the Sedgwick site, it was 80 col/100 mL. This
difference in total coliform bacteria densities reflects the differing methods by which the
water is diverted from the river. At the Sedgwick site where water to be recharged is
diverted directly from the river and treated, the bacterial densities were larger. Densities
in water from the shallow and deep monitoring wells at the Halstead site after artificial
recharge began were generally less than 1 col/100 mL, with a few exceptions. At the Sedgwick
site, maximum densities in water from the shallow and deep monitoring wells after artificial
recharge began were 56 and 8 col/100 mL, respectively.
Effects of artificial recharge on total coliform bacteria densities at the Halstead site were
minimal. At the Sedgwick site, treatment reduced the bacterial densities by a factor of about
100, and the median concentration in ground water was less than 1 col/100 mL before and after
recharge. Bacteria were detected infrequently in water from the shallow monitoring wells.
Atrazine, a herbicide used on corn and grain sorghum, has an MCL of 3.0 µg/L as an
annual mean concentration (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001). It is a chemical of
concern because it was detected in water from both surface-water monitoring sites and in
water from nearly all monitoring wells at the recharge sites. Atrazine concentrations in
ground water were much smaller than in surface water and were less than 3.0 µg/L
(fig.
4). In water from the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, the median
atrazine concentration was 1.0 µg/L. Atrazine has been detected in the diverted source
water and in before-recharge water samples from shallow and deep monitoring wells at the
Halstead recharge site, but all median concentrations determined for samples from these wells
after recharge began were small and ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 µg/L.
The median atrazine concentration in water from the Sedgwick surface-water monitoring site
was 2.0 µg/L. The maximum atrazine concentration in the treated recharge water at
Sedgwick was 6.8 µg/L. This concentration occurred at the beginning of artificial
recharge operations when the treatment process malfunctioned. Concentrations in water from
the monitoring wells at the Sedgwick recharge site were smaller, but atrazine concentrations
were as large as 0.39 µg/L in water from the shallow monitoring wells. Concentrations
of atrazine in water from the shallow wells were substantially less than 3.0 µg/L.
Concentrations in water from the deep monitoring wells were all less than 0.10 µg/L.
Atrazine concentrations in samples from wells at both recharge sites were less than 0.10
µg/L, substantially less than 3.0 µg/L and generally were slightly larger than
before-recharge concentrations.
The overall effects of artificial recharge on water quality in the Equus Beds aquifer
are not substantial when comparing median concentrations before recharge to those after
recharge began for chloride, arsenic, total coliform bacteria, and atrazine. There was a
slight increase of atrazine in water from deep monitoring wells at the Halstead recharge
site. There also was an increase in arsenic concentrations at the Halstead recharge site
because of naturally occurring elevated concentrations in the diverted source water.
Concentrations of the four chemicals of concern increased in water from some of the
monitoring wells to about the same concentrations as those found in diverted or diverted
treated source water, whereas concentrations in water from a few wells decreased. Median
concentrations of chloride, arsenic, total coliform bacteria, and atrazine were all
substantially less than their respective drinking-water standards. After recharge began,
concentrations of these chemicals were similar to before-recharge concentrations. However,
median arsenic concentrations in samples from the diverted source water and in water from
deep wells at the Halstead site exceeded the proposed arsenic MCL of 10 µg/L. Continued
monitoring of the chemicals of concern will help prevent artificial recharge from degrading
water quality in the Equus Beds aquifer.
- Burns and McDonnell, 1998, Equus Beds Ground Water Recharge Demonstration
Project summary of activities for calendar year 1997: Kansas City, Missouri, Burns and
McDonnell Engineering Consultants, prepared for the city of Wichita Water and Sewer
Department, 34 p.
- Christensen, V.G., Jian, Xiaodong, and Ziegler, A.C., 2000, Regression analysis and
real-time water-quality monitoring to estimate constituent concentrations, loads, and
yields in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1995-99: U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00˜4126, 36 p.
- Hem, J.D., 1992, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural
water (3d ed): U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, 263 p.
- Stramel, G.J., 1967, Progress report on the ground-water hydrology of the
Equus beds area, Kansas, 1966: Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin 187, part 2, 27
p.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001, Current drinking water standards:
accessed March 5, 2001, at URL http://www.epa.gov/ost/ drinking/standards
- Warren, D.R., Blain, G.T., Shorney, F.L., and Klein, L.J., 1995, IR--a case study
from Kansas: Journal of the American Water Works Association, June 1995, p. 57-71.
- Watts, K.R., and Stullken, L.E., 1985, Generalized configuration of the base of the
High Plains aquifer in Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-344, 1 sheet,
map scale 1:500,000.
- Ziegler, A.C., Christensen, V.G., and Ross, H.C., 1999, Baseline water quality and
preliminary effects of artificial recharge on ground water, south-central Kansas, 1995-98:
U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4250, 74 p.
For more information on recharge activities in the Equus Beds aquifer in Kansas, visit
the USGS Web site at:
http://ks.water.usgs.gov/studies/equus
or contact:
District Chief
U.S. Geological Survey
4821 Quail Crest Place
Lawrence, Kansas 66049-3839
(785) 842-9909
email: waucott@usgs.gov