USGS - science for a changing world

Kansas Water Science Center

Homehome Sudieswater data & studies Research Labresearch lab Pubspublications Floodflood Droughtdrought Contactcontact
Contract All | Expand All
PUBLICATIONS
DATA CENTER
WATER DATA & STUDIES
INFORMATION CENTER
ABOUT KANSAS WSC
USGS IN YOUR STATE

USGS Water Science Centers are located in each state.

There is a USGS Water Science Center office in each State. Washington Oregon California Idaho Nevada Montana Wyoming Utah Colorado Arizona New Mexico North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Texas Minnesota Iowa Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Wisconsin Illinois Mississippi Michigan Indiana Ohio Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Pennsylvania West Virginia Georgia Florida Caribbean Alaska Hawaii New York Vermont New Hampshire Maine Massachusettes South Carolina North Carolina Rhode Island Virginia Connecticut New Jersey Maryland-Delaware-D.C.

Comparison of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Gas Chromatography Procedures for the Detection of Cyanazine and Metolachlor in Surface Water Samples

By S.M. Schraer, D.R. Shaw, M. Boyette, R.H. Coupe, and E.M. Thurman <

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) data from surface water reconnaissance were compared to data from samples analyzed by gas chromatography for the pesticide residues cyanazine (2[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile) and metolachlor 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide). When ELISA analyses were duplicated, cyanazine and metolachlor detection was found to have highly reproducible results: adjusted Rīs were 0.97 and 0.84, respectively. When ELISA results for cyanazine were regressed against gas chromatography results, the models effectively predicted cyanazine concentrations from ELISA analyses (adjusted Rīs ranging from 0.76 to 0.81). The intercepts and slopes for these models were not different from 0 and 1, respectively. This indicates that cyanazine analysis by ELISA is expected to give the same results as analysis by gas chromatography. However, regressing ELISA analyses for metolachlor against gas chromatography data provided more variable results (adjusted Rīs ranged from 0.67 to 0.94). Regression models for metolachlor analyses had two of three intercepts that were not different from 0. Slopes for all metolachlor regression models were significantly different from 1. This indicates that as metolachlor concentrations increase, ELISA will over- or under-estimate metolachlor concentration, depending on the method of comparison. ELISA can be effectively used to detect cyanazine and metolachlor in surface water samples. However, when detections of metolachlor have significant consequences or implications it may be necessary to use other analytical methods.

Additional information about the Organic Geochemistry Research Laboratory can be found at: http://ks.water.usgs.gov/studies/reslab/

Schraer, S.M., Shaw, D.R., Boyette, M., Coupe, R.H., and Thurman, E.M., 2000, Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gas chromatography procedures for the detection of cyanazine and metolachlor in surface water samples [abst.]: Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, v. 48, p. 5861-5886.

To request a paper copy of this journal article, email: scribner@.usgs.gov

USGS Home Water Resources Biology Geography Geology Geospatial

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: /pubs/abstracts/jafc.v48.html
Page Contact Information: GS-W-KS_info@usgs.gov
Page Last Modified:Wednesday, 17-Sep-2008 12:53:53 CDT